Having devoted a big chunk of my adult life to serving
academics, I've been around a lot of academics (and pre-academics... even
pseudo-academics). I don’t think of myself as an academic... more of a
para-academic. But I enjoy the sport... a lot.
Often times academic discussions might be characterized as
experimental speech. Sometimes there may be explicit rules, such as “what is
said here stays here.” Often, in academic contexts, the rules are merely
implied, allowing participants to float ideas for the community to debate. The
productive tension found in a robust community results in better, more sound
ideas that may then serve as foundations for action or further thought.
I’ve found a handy tool suited for this sort of tension-filled,
robust debate or experimental speech. Empower people to throw a flag. We
sometimes get so focused on the ideas that we disregard the people. A highly
productive team should self-police and throw a flag when necessary.
So I tell colleagues: If you find me committing a foul,
please throw a flag (I've been known to commit unnecessary roughness, pass
interference, and such, during exuberant, academic debate).
Sometimes people throw a flag; there are those more tuned-in
to feelings and perceived attacks and those valued members throw a flag… for
themselves, but often on behalf of others. Throwing a flag gives the team a moment to refocus, and perhaps the speaker to clarify, or apologize. Just knowing that there are those
empowered to throw a flag gives people freedom to speak, to float ideas and
advocate for their positions. The presence of such a guard rail usually results in more
productive discussion.